Редактирование: Richard Stallman, Free software: ethics and practice
Материал из eSyr's wiki.
Внимание: Вы не представились системе. Ваш IP-адрес будет записан в историю изменений этой страницы.
ПРЕДУПРЕЖДЕНИЕ: Длина этой страницы составляет 68 килобайт. Страницы, размер которых приближается к 32 КБ или превышает это значение, могут неверно отображаться в некоторых браузерах. Пожалуйста, рассмотрите вариант разбиения страницы на меньшие части.
Правка может быть отменена. Пожалуйста, просмотрите сравнение версий, чтобы убедиться, что это именно те изменения, которые вас интересуют, и нажмите «Записать страницу», чтобы изменения вступили в силу.
Текущая версия | Ваш текст | ||
Строка 47: | Строка 47: | ||
Most of society teaches you that when you judge a program, you should | Most of society teaches you that when you judge a program, you should | ||
judge it solely in superficial practical terms. How powerful is it? | judge it solely in superficial practical terms. How powerful is it? | ||
- | How convenient? How reliable? What | + | How convenient? How reliable? What is it cost? All superficial practial. |
They don't suggest, they don't teach you to ask yourself the really | They don't suggest, they don't teach you to ask yourself the really | ||
important questions. Does this program respect my freedom? Does this | important questions. Does this program respect my freedom? Does this | ||
Строка 57: | Строка 57: | ||
Proprietary software, which is non-free software, keeps the users divided | Proprietary software, which is non-free software, keeps the users divided | ||
- | and helpless. Divided because they are forbidden to share with anybody | + | and helpless. Divided, because they are forbidden to share with anybody |
- | else, and helpless because they don't have the source code, so they can't | + | else, and helpless, because they don't have the source code, so they can't |
change anything, they can't even verify independently, what the program | change anything, they can't even verify independently, what the program | ||
is actually doing to them, and many of those programs do nasty things | is actually doing to them, and many of those programs do nasty things | ||
Строка 89: | Строка 89: | ||
{00:07:25} | {00:07:25} | ||
- | But if one of these freedoms is missing | + | But if one of these freedoms is missing of insufficient, then the program |
is proprietary software, non-free software, user-subjugating software, | is proprietary software, non-free software, user-subjugating software, | ||
because the social system of it's distribution and use is unethical. So, | because the social system of it's distribution and use is unethical. So, | ||
Строка 138: | Строка 138: | ||
{00:11:10} | {00:11:10} | ||
- | However | + | However, why is this the lesser evil? Well, if you can't help doing wrong |
to somebody or other, better you should do it to somebody who deserves | to somebody or other, better you should do it to somebody who deserves | ||
- | it. [laughter] Now, we can assume that your friend is a good friend | + | it. [laughter] Now, we can assume that your friend is a good friend and |
- | + | a good member your community and normally deserves your cooperation, | |
- | because that way he might learn. But in any case, the case | + | because you might want cooperate even with somebody who is not helpful, |
- | case. We | + | because that way he might learn. But in any case, the case words /?/ |
+ | of good friend, a good member of your community is the sharpest moral | ||
+ | case /?/. We can thrust /?/ with him the developer of the proprietary | ||
program, who has deliberately attacked the social solidarity of your | program, who has deliberately attacked the social solidarity of your | ||
- | community. If you can't help doing wrong to one or the other, then | + | community. If you can't help doing wrong to the one or the other, then |
- | you should do it to him, | + | you should do it to him, to developer. |
{00:12:07} | {00:12:07} | ||
However, being the lesser evil, doesn't mean it's good. It's never a | However, being the lesser evil, doesn't mean it's good. It's never a | ||
- | good thing | + | good thing. So making agreement and then break it. Now there are some |
agreements that are evil in themselves, and keeping them is even worse | agreements that are evil in themselves, and keeping them is even worse | ||
- | + | then breaking them. This is an example. But still, making an agreement | |
and breaking it is not good. | and breaking it is not good. | ||
- | And if you give your friend a copy, what | + | And if you give your friend a copy, what would your friend have? Your |
friend will have an unauthorized copy of a proprietary program and | friend will have an unauthorized copy of a proprietary program and | ||
that's a pretty bad thing, almost as bad as an authorized copy would | that's a pretty bad thing, almost as bad as an authorized copy would |